Math 2540 — Homework Problems

\( \def\gp{{\mathfrak{p}}} \def\ord{\operatorname{ord}} \)
Important Note: Some problems may not be stated exactly correctly! It's up to you to decide if there is a counter-example to the given statement. If there is a counter-example, find one, and then correct the statement to something that's true (and still interesting) and prove the corrected statement. For example, the first few problems are stated for general rings, but are they for all rings, or do they need \(R\) to be an integral domain or a Dedekind domain?

Problem # 1: Let \(R\) be a ring, let \(\gp\) be a prime ideal of \(R\), and let \(R_\gp\) denote the completion of \(R\) at \(\gp\), i.e., \[ R_\gp = \lim_{\leftarrow} R/\gp^{n+1}. \]
(a) Prove that \(R_\gp\) is an integral domain.
(b) There are natural maps \(\alpha_n : R_\gp \to R/\gp^{n+1}\). Prove that \(\operatorname{ker}(\alpha_0)\) is the unique maximal ideal of \(R_\gp\). In particular, \(R_\gp\) is a local ring.
By abuse of notation, we will often write \(\gp\) for \(\operatorname{ker}(\alpha_0)\), although more accurate notations would be \(\gp R_\gp\) or \(\gp_\gp\).


Problem # 2: For \(x\in R_\gp\), define \[ \ord_\gp(x) = \min \{ n \ge 0 : x \not\equiv 0\pmod{\gp^{n+1}} \}. \] (And set \(\ord_\gp(0)=\infty\).) Prove that:
(a) \(\ord_\gp(xy) = \ord_\gp(x)+\ord_\gp(y)\).
(b) \(\ord_\gp(x+y) \ge \min\{ \ord_\gp(x),\ord_\gp(y) \}\).
(c) If \(\ord_\gp(x)\ne\ord_\gp(y)\), then \(\ord_\gp(x+y) = \min\{ \ord_\gp(x),\ord_\gp(y) \}\).


Problem # 3: (a) Prove that \(R_\gp\) is complete, i.e., prove that every Cauchy sequence in \(R_\gp\) converges to an element of \(R_\gp\).
(b) Prove that \(R_\gp\) is Hausdorff.
(c) If \(R/\gp\) is finite, prove that \(R_\gp\) is compact, and deduce that \(K_\gp\) is locally compact.


Problem # 4: This exercise gives two generalizations of Hensel's lemma. The first relaxes the condition that \(f'(a_0)\not\equiv0\pmod{\gp}\), and the second is an algebraic geometry version that is very useful. (If you haven't taken algebraic geometry, don't worry about the second version.)
(a) Suppose that \(f(X)\in R_\gp[X]\) is a non-zero polynomial and that \(a_0\in R\) satisfies \[ f(a_0)\equiv 0\pmod{\gp^{2k+1}} \quad\hbox{and}\quad f'(a_0)\not\equiv 0\pmod{\gp^{k+1}} \] for some \(k\gt 0\). Prove that there is a unique \(a\in R_\gp\) satisfying \[ a\equiv a_0\pmod{\gp^{2k+1}} \quad\hbox{and}\quad f(a)=0. \] (b) Let \(F(X_1,\ldots,X_N)\in R_\gp[X_1,\ldots,X_N]\) be a non-zero polynomial and let \(V\) be the affine variety defined by \(F=0\). Also let \(\tilde V\) denote the variety \(F=0\) over the residue field \(R_\gp/\gp\). Let \(Q_0\in \tilde V(R_\gp/\gp)\) be a non-singular point of \(\tilde V\). Prove that there is a point \(Q\in V(R_\gp)\) satisfying \(Q\equiv Q_0\pmod{\gp}\). Is \(Q\) necessarily unique?
(b') Prove a more general result that holds for a mod \(\gp\) nonsingular point on any affine variety defined by equations with coefficients in \(R_\gp\).
(b'') Prove a simlar result that holds for a mod \(\gp\) nonsingular point on any projective variety defined by homogeneous equations with coefficients in \(K_\gp\).


Problem # 5: We defined \(|\cdot|\) to be non-archimedean if \[ |x+y| \le \max \{ |x|, |y| \} \quad\hbox{for all \(x\) and \(y\)}. \] And we defined \(|\cdot|\) to be archimedean if for all \(x\ne0\) and all \(C>0\), there is an integer \(n\ge1\) such that \(|nx|>C\). Prove that these definitions are consistant in the sense that \(|\cdot|\) is non-archimedean if and only if it is not archimedean.


Problem # 6: Let \(R\) be the ring of integers in a number field \(K\), let \(\gp\) be a prime ideal, let \(q=N_{K/\mathbb{Q}}\gp\), and for \(x\in K^*\) define \[ |x|_\gp = q^{-\ord_\gp(x)}. \] (Here \(\ord_\gp(x)\) is defined by writing \(x=a/b\) with \(a,b\in R\) and setting \(\ord_\gp(x)=\ord_\gp(a)-\ord_\gp(b)\).) We also set \(|0|_\gp=0\).
(a) Prove that \(|\cdot|_\gp\) is a non-archimedean absolute value on \(R\).
(b) Prove that \(|\cdot|_\gp\) extends uniquely to a non-archimedean absolute value on \(R_\gp\).
(c) Prove that \(R_\gp\) is complete for the topology induced by the absolute value \(|\cdot|_\gp\).


Problem # 7: We proved in class that every non-archimedean absolute value on \(\mathbb{Q}\) is equivalent to some \(p\)-adic absolute value \(|\cdot|_p\). Let \(|\cdot|\) be an archimedean absolute value on \(\mathbb{Q}\). Prove that \(|\cdot|\) is equivalent to the usual absolute value \(|x|_\infty=\max\{x,-x\}\) on \(\mathbb{Q}\) associated to the embedding \(\mathbb{Q}\to\mathbb{R}\). (Hint: Fix an integer \(b\gt 1\) and use the \(b\)-expansion of \(a\in\mathbb{Z}\), i.e., write \(a=c_0+c_1b+\cdots+c_rb^r\) with \(0\le c_i\lt b\).)


Problem # 8: If you've never done this type of construction before, it's worth doing once.
Let \((K,|\cdot|)\) be a valued field, i.e., a field with an absolute value on it. Prove that there exists a unique (up to unique isomorphism) valued field \((K',|\cdot|')\) with the following properties:
(i) \((K',|\cdot|')\) is complete, i.e., every Cauchy sequence converges.
(ii) There is an inclusion \((K,|\cdot|)\subset(K',|\cdot|')\) of valued fields.
(iii) If \((K,|\cdot|)\subset(K'',|\cdot|'')\) is any other inclusion of valued fields with \(K''\) complete, then there is a unique inclusion \((K',|\cdot|')\subset(K'',|\cdot|'')\) that is compatible with the inclusions of \((K,|\cdot|)\).
The field \(K'\) is called the completion of \(K\). Prove further that \(K\) is dense in \(K'\) with respect topology induced by the absolute value.
Hint: To construct \(K'\), consider the collection \(\mathcal{C}\) consisting of all Cauchy sequences in \(K\), and mod out \(\mathcal{C}\) by the relation that \((a_i)\sim(b_i)\) if \(\lim |a_i-b_i|=0\). u8


Problem # 9: Let \((K,|\cdot|)\) be a valued field and let \[ f(X) = X^d+a_1X^{d-1}+\cdots+a_d = (X-b_1)(X-b_2)\cdots(X-b_d) \] be a polynomial, where \(a_1,\ldots,a_d,b_1,\ldots,b_d\in K\). Let \(C=2\) if the absolute value is archimedean and let \(C=1\) if the absolute value is non-archimedean. Prove that \[ C^{-d} |f| \le \prod_{i=1}^d \max\{ |b_i|,1 \} \le C^d |f|. \] This gives a very useful relation between the size of the coefficients of a polynomial and the size of its roots.


Problem # 10: (a) Prove that the natural inclusion \[ R_\gp := \lim_{\leftarrow} R/\gp^{n+1} \subset \prod_{n\ge 0} R/\gp^{n+1} \] makes the inverse limit into a closed subset of the product, where each \(R/\gp^{n+1}\) is given the discrete topology, and where the product is given the product topology. Deduce that \(R_\gp\) is compact. (We are assuming that the \(R/\gp^{n+1}\) are finite).
(b) The unit group \(R_\gp^*\) is given a topolgy via the embedding \[ R_\gp^* \longrightarrow R_\gp\times R_\gp,\qquad x \longmapsto (x,x^{-1}). \] Prove that \(R_\gp^*\) is compact.


Problem # 11: (a) Find all extensions \(K/\mathbb{Q}_p\) satisfying \([K:\mathbb{Q}_p]=2\). (The answer is more complicated for \(p=2\) than it is for odd primes.)
(b) Same question for \([K:\mathbb{Q}_p]=3\), at least for \(p\ne 3\). Can you also do \(p=3\)? Try doing the cubic Galois extensions first.


Important Note: The rest of the course will cover material in The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves, 2nd edition. Exercises in the book will be denoted [AEC C.N], where C is the chapter number and N is the problem number.


Problems # 12–15: Problems on Formal Groups (AEC page 135)
# 12: [AEC 4.1]
# 13: [AEC 4.2(a)]
# 14: [AEC 4.3]
# 15: [AEC 4.6]


Problem # XXX16: Let \(\mathcal{F}\) and \(\mathcal{G}\) be formal groups over a ring \(R\), and let \(\text{Hom}_R(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})\) denote the set of formal-group homomorphisms from \(\mathcal{F}\) to \(\mathcal{G}\).
(a) Define a binary operation \(\star\) on \(\text{Hom}_R(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})\) as follows: for \(f_1,f_2,\in \text{Hom}_R(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})\), set \[ (f_1\star f_2)(T) = G(f_1(T),f_2(T)). \] Prove that \(f_1\star f_2\) is in \(\text{Hom}_R(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})\), and that \(\star\) makes \(\text{Hom}_R(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})\) into a group.
(b) Let \(\text{End}_R(\mathcal{F})=\text{Hom}_R(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{F})\). Prove that \(\text{End}_R(\mathcal{F})\) is a ring, where the \(\star\) operation from (a) is "addition" and composition of power series is "multiplication".


Problem # XXX17: Prove the following generalization of Lemma IV.2.4. Let \(R\) be a ring, let \(x\) be an indeterminate, and let \(f(T)\in R[x][[T]]\) be a power series with coefficients in the polynomial ring \(R[x]\). Suppose further that \(f\) has the form \[ f(T) = xT + (\text{higher order terms}). \] Prove that there is a unique power series \(g(T)\in R[x,x^{-1}][[T]]\) such that \(f(g(T))=T\). More precisely, prove that \(g(T)\) has the form \[ g(T) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{b_n}{x^{2n-1}}T^n \quad\text{with \(b_n\in R[x]\).} \]


Return to the Math 2540 Home Page